Search Engine Optimization
on a Shoestring: Best Practices in Low Cost
Website Optimization and Submission
by
Coyote Holmberg
September, 2005
Click Here for a downloadable PDF copy of this article.
Abstract
A website which cannot be found is a website
which cannot fulfill its online marketing strategy. Since
most Internet users use search engines and directories
to find resources, a key strategy for attracting
customers to one’s website involves achieving
optimal positioning in the results delivered
by keyword queries submitted to search engines. The
quickest way to accomplish this is through the
use of paid inclusion and advertising programs.
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is the ongoing
process of preparing and editing a website or
webpage so as to improve its chances of receiving
a high rank and visibility in the results shown
from search queries on relevant terms. By using
proper SEO techniques, even a business with little
or no cash available to budget for online promotion
can prepare its website and web pages so as to
maximize their potential for achieving high search
rankings and therefore attain increased visibility
to potential online customers.
Search Engine Optimization
on a Shoestring:
Best Practices in Low Cost Website
Optimization and Submission
A few years ago, I viewed a television commercial
depicting a fictional start-up company which
had just posted it’s website on the Internet. In
this commercial, the website instantly began
receiving visits, and because of this, the company
was immediately flooded with orders for its product. Unfortunately,
while this technique of “Build It and They
Will Come” may work in the movies (and
commercials), it is not quite so viable in the
real world for attracting customers to one’s
website. An effective online marketing
strategy requires more than simply having a website:
it hinges on the prospective customer actually
finding one’s website when that customer
is searching for a provider of one’s services. It
does no good to have a website that no-one can
find, and having customers instantly and miraculously
find one’s new site only occurs in commercials.
This may appear to be an obvious statement,
but for a new business or for a business on a
limited budget, accomplishing this “find-ability” involves
a significant amount of careful effort. If
one has the resources, paid options for promoting
one’s site and achieving an optimal search
engine positioning are plentiful: one can simply
purchase sponsor ads and pay-per-click programs
on all the major search engines and directories,
and even tailor the ads to one’s specific
situation and needs. For a business seeking
to contain costs and still achieve visibility
on the web and high page rankings in search engines,
the best practices for website submission and
optimization for the major search engines and
directories include the correct use of keywords
in metatags and page body text, writing effective
page and site titles, developing a linking strategy,
and avoiding practices that can get one’s
site de-listed or banned by search engines, such
as keyword spamming and using link farms.
Website Visibility and
Search Engine Page Rankings
Most websites are destined for obscurity. Michael
and Salter note that “the top 10 percent
[of web pages and domains] receive around 90
percent of the overall traffic. The Web
is a very tough place for small sites to get
exposure, particularly those without a large
budget for promotion.” (Michael & Salter,
2003, p.89).
In April of 1998, there were 2.2 million plus sites on the Internet.
(Lemoine, 1999). At that time, simply having a website and submitting
it to a search engine or two was sufficient to achieve at least a measure of
noteworthiness and visibility. This is no longer true: a Google search on
a single word or phrase can generate millions of hits. Typing the
word "roses" into Google at 3:30pm on Thursday, August 18, 2005 gave
10,400,000 results. Obviously, if one is in the business of selling roses,
one would prefer not to be hit number 10,398,900, as a prospective customer
might at most only explore the links offered on the first few pages
of results. While having a web presence is important, having a website
alone is no longer sufficient: the new holy grail of internet marketing is
a web presence with a high page ranking on the major search engines.
A search engine rank is the order in which the
engine lists the results of a search. A high
page ranking is one in which a webpage is listed
within the first few pages of a search result
on a major search engine when the search is conducted
using keywords that are likely to be used by
a consumer interested in services, information,
or products offered on the site in question. Achieving
a high ranking is important, since the average
person using a search engine is unlikely to explore
every single one of the potentially millions
of link results.
Various forms of paid services and advertising
are available both to promote one’s site
and to improve site visibility and positioning
in search engine results. They are
offered in a wide variety of forms, including
Google AdWords, Yahoo Sponsor Search and Enhanced
Listings, MSN Sponsored Sites, and of course
Pay Per Click advertising on numerous search
engines. Each of these options will, for varying
prices, provide expedited and, depending on budget,
optimal positioning of one’s advertisement
and/or website listing in a prominent location
on the search results page. The advantage
to these options is that one’s site will
receive preferential treatment and positioning. The
disadvantage for those businesses operating on
a constrained budget is of course the expense
involved, which can swiftly and easily spiral
into the hundreds and thousands of dollars. Fortunately,
alternatives do exist.
Spider or crawler based search engines use software
robots to find web pages and build an index of
pages with the words and phrases found on each
page. The search engine then uses additional
software to match a user’s keyword query
with a sorted list of web pages from its index
that it deems most likely to contain the information
the user is looking for. Directories are
distinct from this in that directories are databases
of sites which have been added by human editors. Hybrid
services use a combination of spider indexing
and directories to provide results. (Thurow,
2003).
Best Practices and Techniques in Search Engine Optimization
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is the use of
various techniques to improve a website’s
ranking with search engines and thereby increase
one’s chances of attracting potential visitors. Also
referred to as Organic or Natural Search Engine
Optimization, it remains a powerful strategy
with which to significantly increase one’s
prospects of achieving a high page ranking while
minimizing one’s cash outlay.
Using best practices in creating an effective
SEO campaign for a website is a project that
includes several key components. First, before
even submitting the website, one must put together
a plan which ideally will incorporate an understanding
that SEO is an ongoing process that requires
a clear direction, focused research, solid documentation
and results tracking, and consistent follow-up. More
specifically, the steps in developing a SEO project
begin with research: clearly defining one’s
objectives for the website, identifying the target
audience, and determining how they might find
you. One also needs to implement a documentation
system: this can be as simple as a notebook or
spreadsheet. This will be used to keep
track of keywords, URL submissions, and other
aspects of the project. This is followed by the
actual optimization and submission of the site. Following
this, one will need to analyze the results of
ones work and use this information to develop
appropriate revisions or updates to the site
and strategy.
Just as a website must be well-designed in terms
of usability, it must now also be designed with
search engine requirements in mind. Effective
optimization of a site requires that one take
into consideration the distinct requirements
for submission and indexing by engines and directories,
as well as the specific requirements indicated
for individual search engines and directories. Effective
utilization of one’s time and effort in
optimizing a site means that one focuses first
on the major search engines and directories,
and in particular on those one’s prospective
customers are using. And they are using
search engines.
Consider the following: “More than 95 percent of Internet users in the United States visit search
engines to find information, products, or services on the Web. According to
comScore Networks, a firm that tracks search engine usage, 35 percent of all
keyword searches are performed through Google, 32 percent are performed through
Yahoo, and 16 percent are performed through MSN. The remaining 17 percent are
performed through Excite, AOL, and other sites.” (Schultz and Fristedt,
2005, p. 10)
As noted in Association Management,
a number of factors are incorporated into the
search engine’s determination of the rank
of a given page. These include but are
not limited to the sites text copy, underlying
technology, structure, and the number and ranking
of pages that link to the site. (Schultz and
Fristedt, 2005). Meta tags are not used
by all of the major search engines for determining
site relevancy for search results, though some
do use Meta tag descriptions when they show the
results of a search. (Thurow, 2003). To
further complicate matters, different search
engines use different methods for ranking pages,
and they regularly adjust and refine their methods
for ranking sites.
Site Objectives, Keyword Identification,
and Page Content
Defining the objectives of a site will aid in
targeting directory submissions, developing link
popularity campaigns and determining possible
association links and resources. Once you have
identified your target audience, you can then
begin to identify specific keywords that they
are likely to use when using a search engine
to find what you have to offer. These are
the keywords that will be incorporated into the
page text and Meta tag content. As Kevin Gold
succinctly put it: “Your objective is selecting
relevant keywords that connect your customer’s
preconceived expectation with your product or
service.” (Gold, 2005).
As part of this identification process, perform
searches using possible keywords and take a look
at what type of websites receive high rankings
with these keywords. A number of free keyword
tracking and suggestion tools are available online:
these tools provide information such as the number
of times a search was performed using a given
keyword or phrase in the previous day or month,
as well as lists of alternate or similar keywords/phrases,
ranked by frequency of search. These resources
can be found both on the search engine sites
as well as on independent websites.
In building the collection of keywords and phrases
to use in optimizing one’s site, one will
first need to select a top-level keyword: this
is the most general term to describe one’s
site. Next, create two lists: one for vertical
keywords, one for lateral keywords. Vertical
keywords include all forms variations of the
top-level keyword, as both phrases and singular/plural
terms. Lateral keywords are alternative
keywords that a user might enter as search terms:
they relate in some way to the top-level keyword
for one’s site or product, but do not actually
include it. (Daily SEO, 2005). For example, lateral
keywords for the keyword “roses” might
include “gardens”, “bouquet”,
and “bare root”. Once the best keywords
and phrases have been identified and selected,
the actual optimization of the pages can begin.
In determining which pages to show in response
to a given keyword query, search engines look
for the presence and frequency of the keyword
in various locations in the HTML tags and body
text on the page. Different search engines
place emphasis on different tags, so one should
place the keywords in all the HTML tags possible. This
specifically includes the Title tags, Meta tags,
the alternative text for graphic images, and
the body text.
The Title tag is essential, as it is what the
search engine will show as the title of your
site in a results listing, as well as being one
of the primary factors considered in ranking
a page. (Michael and Salter, 2005).
The description and keywords Meta tags are also
significant for search engine indexing in that
they can influence the description of the website
shown in the results given by some search engines,
as well as providing additional keywords for
the search engines to use in indexing the page. These
tags are not used by all search engines. The
description tag in particular should contain
a brief, carefully written description of the
site that both contains the most important keywords
and is written in such a way as to entice a person
to choose one’s site when it appears in
a search result. The description tag contents
are additionally significant when submitting
one’s site to be evaluated for inclusion
in a directory.
Body text content should, to quote Newton (2002), “be
brief, focused, and internally consistent”.
It should contain the selected keywords as part
of the copy on the page while again avoiding
the use of keyword spamming practices such as
loading up the page with a multitude of keywords. (Goldsborough,
2005). Correct use could be: “Roses are
a delightful addition to a flower garden. Bare
root roses are on sale.” Keyword
spamming, which can get a site penalized, would
include for example: “roses, roses, roses,
roses, roses, roses, roses, roses, garden, garden,
garden, flower, flower, flower.” Also,
regularly updating the content that contains
the relevant keywords will increase page rankings,
as search engines evaluate a page which is regularly
updated as containing greater relevance than
a site which is only updated sporadically, if
at all. (Schultz and Fristedt, 2005).
In incorporating the keywords in one’s
page, certain SEO techniques are considered to
be attempts to trick search engines into improving
one’s site ranking, and can get one’s
site penalized and even de-listed. This
includes the keyword spamming mentioned above,
both in the body text and in the Meta tags. It
also includes such practices as placing keyword
laden text on a page in such a manner as to be
invisible or difficult to read by humans, such
as using tiny black text on a black background.
The Impact of Architecture’s on Ranking
Page and site architecture can adversely impact
a website’s ranking. Search engines tend
to rank more highly pages that are in the first
two directory levels in a site, and may ignore
pages that are deeply nested in folders and sub-directories.
A flattened site structure can provide a noticeable
advantage if one wishes to position multiple
pages in the site optimally for search engines.
Frames in particular can potentially render the
pages in a site invisible to search engines. This
is because the typical frameset code lacks index-able
content beyond the Meta tags and Title tag text. If
one is optimizing a framed website, this can
be worked around by including <noframes> tags
on the frameset page, and include both keyword
rich content and links to key pages in the site
within the <noframes> tags. (Thurow, 2005).
Dynamic sites present a different kind of problem
for search engines. This is partially because
the pages are dynamically delivered by a database
program, and partially because many of these
programs when creating URLs use the ? and other
symbols: these same symbols act as signals to
the crawler to stop indexing the site. When optimizing
a dynamic site, one will need to utilize workarounds
to address these problems. The database
programs can be configured to avoid the use of
problematic symbols. One can directly submit
specific dynamic URLs to the search engines. And
finally, one can incorporate static pages into
one’s website that link to content within
the database. (Michael and Salter, 2005).
Search engines are increasingly doing a better
job of indexing rich media content such as music,
movies, and Flash. Ensuring that any such
content one offers will be indexed simply involves
remembering that these types of files do not
contain simple text and therefore must be prepared
properly for indexing. This can be accomplished
by completing all the metadata with well structured
content and by making sure that the HTML page
linking to the file can be crawled by search
engines and has complete and accurate anchor
text (including titles) on the individual link
to the file. (K’necht, 2004).
Some sites incorporate a considerable amount
of Flash either on the entrance page or in the
page content. While this can make for a
visually dazzling site, it is problematic for
search indexing, as search engines treat Flash
content as a graphic (which the search engine
cannot see). This also means that the search
engine cannot follow any links displayed in Flash. This
is best addressed similarly to the way one handles
a dynamic site: by using well written title and
description Meta tags and by including important
links and text content outside of the Flash portion
of the page. (K’necht, 2004).
Considerations in Submission to Directories and
Search Engines
Once one has optimized the most important pages
on one’s website, one is ready to begin
submitting the key pages in the site to search
engines and directories. One should begin
by submitting one’s site to directory listings,
as directory links also improve the chances of
a search engine’s spiders finding one’s
site, even without one having submitted the site
to the engine.
When submitting to directories, one should not
restrict oneself to submitting solely to the
big players such as Yahoo or the Open Directory. One
should also find and submit to smaller directories
and relevant special interest and business directories,
as the popularity boost provided by having links
to one’s site from multiple directories
can improve the ranking of one’s pages
in the search engines. (Thurow, 2003). Walsh
(2005) comments that “They are the legendary fairy lands of SEO: PageRank-passing, no-fee-charging,
non-corrupt and actually well-run directories of relevant links. Yes, they
really do exist. An SEO friend tells me he knows 200 good ones just off the
top of his head. Plus, there are other kinds of directories: directories of
affiliate programs, of websites using a certain content management system,
of websites whose owners are members of this or that group, of websites accepting
PayPal, etc. etc.”
Clearly, time spent researching appropriate
directories can be well spent. Preparing
for submission to directories is critical, as
one will often have only one chance to win approval
from the human editor who is reviewing one’s
site for inclusion. With a directory, one
will first need to determine which category and
subcategory that would be most appropriate for
one’s site. (There may be several). In
order to improve one’s chances of getting
one’s site accepted, one should review
and closely follow the submission guidelines
provided by the directory site. One is also well
advised to review the site descriptions already
listed in that category, and tailor ones own
description to fit the general writing style
that the editor appears to prefer.
Free submission to the major search engines is
relatively straightforward: all but a few provide
submission forms and guidelines for properly
submitting a page for indexing. One should
always submit the home page of a site. An
additional page which is helpful to submit is
the sitemap, as this will give the spiders access
to the URLs throughout the site. Once a site
has been submitted, it can take up to several
months for the pages to appear in search listings:
for this reason, some may opt for paid-submission
programs if they require expedited results.
A caveat when submitting one’s site: be
wary of link farms and free-for-all links pages:
these types of sites are not the same as human
built directories and can get one’s site
penalized by search engines, as well as being
a source of enormous amounts of spam flooding
one’s email inbox.
Backward Links, Distributed Content, and Reciprocal Linking as Strategies
A backward link is a link to one’s own site from a site which has
content relevant to the content on one’s own website. High quality
backward links provide an increase in the popularity rating of one’s
site, which directly and positively impacts the ranking of the website. The
main methods for acquiring backward links include reciprocal links and distributed
content. Acquiring reciprocal links is easiest if one provides a links page
or a portion of one’s site on which one can place links to other websites.
One then approaches other site owners with an offer to exchange reciprocal
links: in this way both sites can benefit from increased traffic and increased
popularity rankings. Link exchanges and web rings are two sources for identifying
potential link partners. Piggybacking is an option for combining reciprocal
links with keyword positioning. To do this, one uses keyword searches using
both vertical and lateral keywords for one’s own site, and identify as
potential link partners those sites with related but not identical products. For
example, a site offering rose bushes might find it beneficial to exchange links
with sites selling garden tools and accessories.
Providing distributed content can be a very effective
way to increase one’s site ranking, become
recognized as an authority in one’s given
area as well as to drive traffic to one’s
site. This process is straightforward, though
it does involve some effort: write articles on
topics relevant to the content in one’s
site, submit them and get them published to e-zine
and article sites, and include a link to one’s
own site (this is usually done in the “about
the author” section at the end of the article). Because
these articles tend to remain archived on the
articles sites and can also be exchanged and
posted on additional e-zine sites, over time
one can accumulate a significant quantity of
high quality links to one’s own site using
this method. (Walsh, 2005).
Measuring Effectiveness
Tracking and measuring the effectiveness of one’s
SEO campaign in meeting one’s defined goals
is an ongoing part of the SEO process, and is
used to evaluate and make refinements and revisions
so as to further improve the site’s search
engine friendliness. The main information
needed includes monthly traffic reports including
the number of unique visitors, search engine
ranking reports, click through reports, and sales
data. Additionally, one will want to know
which search phrases and engines the visitors
have used to find one’s site. A variety
of tools exist to provide the relevant information:
these may be included with website hosting packages,
or they may be found as free or low cost stand-alone
resources online. One can also use tools
such as Meta tag checkers, keyword density analyzers,
and page content analyzers. Using these reports
and tools combined can provide effective measurements
and resources to evaluate and further improve
the page’s optimization. That being
said, it bears mentioning again that the free
and low budget approach to SEO is not a tool
for bringing instant results: while paid
inclusion strategies can bring positioning (and
possibly traffic) within a few hours or days
at most, free inclusion turnaround time is best
measured in weeks and months. This is a
long term business promotion strategy, not a
quick-fix.
Conclusion
Regardless of which approaches a company uses,
effective SEO requires knowledge of which search
engines and directories to focus upon and what
they look for in determining how to rank a site. Implementing
best practices is ultimately an ongoing process:
search engine technology and advertising practices
are both continually evolving, and therefore
site optimization requires a planned strategy
involving clear goals, focused research, knowledge
of one’s customer, a basic understanding
of search engines and directories and how they
work, and an understanding of what tools and
resources are available to assist in the optimization
process. With this knowledge, one can write
the content on each page in a manner that both
meets the needs of the human site visitor and
the ranking criteria used by the major search
engines.
Additional optimization strategies such
as building link popularity with distributed
content and reciprocal linking will need to be
evaluated with regards to their relevance and
appropriateness for the specific business in
question. All of this can be accomplished
either for free or at minimal cost by the business
owner or site administrator with a willingness
to expend the necessary time and effort. Used
in combination, these SEO best practices can
work together to achieve the brass ring: a site
with a high page ranking and visibility on all
of the major search engines… a site that
is not destined for obscurity but instead can
be found on the Web.
References
Daily SEO. “Keyword Analysis - Choosing
the Right Keywords”. (2005) Daily SEO:
March 2005. Retrieved September 3, 2005,
from http://www.daily-seo.com/archives/2005/03/02/keyword-analysis-choosing-the-right-keywords/
Deon, Lawrence. “Cracking the Google
Code … Under the GoogleScope: Google's
US Patent confirms information retrieval is based
on historical data”. (2005). Retrieved
September 3, 2005, from wwwcoder.com. http://www.wwwcoder.com/main/parentid/285/site/5033/266/default.aspx.
Gold, Kevin. “The Art of the Pay Per Click
Start – Round 1 of 2”. (2005) Retrieved
September 3, 2005, from ISDB: The Internet Search
Engine Database. http://www.isedb.com/news/article/1218
Goldsporough, Reid. “Search Engine Marketing
Can Backfire on Overloaded Terms”. (2005)
New Orleans City Business: Vol. 25 Issue 30.
p17. [Electronic version] Retrieved August, 2005,
from Oplin.org database. http://web4.epncomet..kin.oplin.org
K’necht, Alan. “Search Engine Optimization
and Non-HTML Sites”. Digital Web Magazine
(2004). Retrieved September 4, 2005 from http://www.digital-web.com/articles/seo_and_non_html_sites/
Lemoine, Virginie. “The Role of the Internet
in Marketing” (1999). Retrieved September
4, 2005 from
http://cci.mccombs.utexas.edu/research/white/int_mark.htm
Michael, Alex & Salter, Ben. Marketing
Through Search Optimization: How to Be Found
on the Web. (2003) Oxford: Elsevier.
Newton, C.J.. “Guide to Search Engine
Optimization”. (2002). Retrieved September
3, 2005 from http://*.marketingpower.com/content14922C284S0.php
Schultz, John & Fristedt, Jay. “Calling
All Search Engines”. (2005). Association
Management, Jun2005 Supplement,
p8. [Electronic version] Retrieved August, 2005,
from Oplin.org database. http://web4.epncomet..kin.oplin.org
Thurow, Shari. Search Engine Visibility. (2003)
Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
Walsh, Joel. “Getting One-way Inbound
Links: the 5 Major Strategies” (2005).
Retrieved September 4, 2005, from http://www.workoninternet.com/article_5266.html

|